XBCI vs. EZBC
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XBCI is actively managed, while EZBC is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
XBCI vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -3.98%
- 1M
- -23.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -18.42%
- YTD
- -25.36%
- 6M
- -29.82%
- 1Y
- -38.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBCI vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -16.32% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -14.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and EZBC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
XBCI
EZBC
XBCI vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCI | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 0.30 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -49.37% | +23.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.99% | -48.04% | +22.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -16.01% | +7.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.42% | — |
Volatility
XBCI vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.08% | 43.67% | +23.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.08% | 50.06% | +17.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.08% | 50.06% | +17.02% |
XBCI vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCI vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 20.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XBCI and EZBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.
XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.19% for EZBC.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer