PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBCI vs. CBOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBCI vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XBCI

1D
-3.98%
1M
-23.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBOO

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBCI vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and CBOO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBCI vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBCI vs. CBOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBCICBOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

-1.19

+0.56

Drawdowns

XBCI vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and CBOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBCICBOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.99%

-2.34%

-23.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.99%

-1.72%

-24.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-1.61%

-6.45%

Volatility

XBCI vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBCICBOODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.08%

2.14%

+64.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.08%

2.14%

+64.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.08%

2.14%

+64.94%

XBCI vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBCI vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XBCI and CBOO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.

XBCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.69% for CBOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBCI and CBOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer