PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBB vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBB vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBB achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


XBB

1D
0.21%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.76%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBB vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XBB
BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.53%8.59%6.41%10.63%-3.77%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%-2.00%3.77%1.27%-15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XBB and UGA is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022

0.00

The correlation between XBB and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBB vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBB
XBB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBB vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBBUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

5.37

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

12.86

-3.38

XBB vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBB and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBBUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.27

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.12

+0.69

Drawdowns

XBB vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBB drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBB and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBBUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-86.59%

+77.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-14.88%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.86%

-26.68%

+22.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-14.75%

+14.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-36.76%

+35.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

6.20%

-5.53%

Volatility

XBB vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) is 1.25%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that XBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBBUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

11.64%

-10.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

30.48%

-27.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

35.27%

-31.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.08%

34.40%

-27.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.08%

37.27%

-30.19%

XBB vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBB vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

XBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBB
BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.55%5.42%6.35%6.15%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBB and UGA have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to XBB (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBB dropped -8.87% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 3-year performance, UGA leads with 20.80% vs 7.84% for XBB. On fees, XBB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XBB has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UGA has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XBB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

XBB has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

XBB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. XBB tracks ICE BofA BB US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XBB and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBB and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer