XBAT.DE vs. XDWH.DE
XBAT.DE (Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XBAT.DE is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone AAA, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XBAT.DE returned -0.93%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. XBAT.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
XBAT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBAT.DE achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XBAT.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of -0.93%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return.
XBAT.DE
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 1.01%
- 3Y*
- 2.22%
- 5Y*
- -2.38%
- 10Y*
- -0.93%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
XBAT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBAT.DE Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF | -0.07% | 2.47% | 0.18% | 3.80% | -17.06% | -2.84% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 2.37% | -1.51% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBAT.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | -0.00 |
The correlation between XBAT.DE and XDWH.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (10 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBAT.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XBAT.DE
XDWH.DE
XBAT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF (XBAT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBAT.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.13 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 0.93 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 2.28 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBAT.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 0.70 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | 0.41 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | 0.51 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.55 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
XBAT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBAT.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAT.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBAT.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.48% | -26.08% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.01% | -10.32% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.50% | -21.12% | +16.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.97% | -21.12% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.48% | -26.08% | +1.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.49% | -8.51% | -7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -4.82% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 4.20% | -3.53% |
Volatility
XBAT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF (XBAT.DE) is 0.75%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that XBAT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBAT.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 4.81% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.93% | 9.51% | -7.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23% | 13.69% | -11.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 13.43% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 14.69% | -9.30% |
XBAT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBAT.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XBAT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBAT.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XBAT.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBAT.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBAT.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
XBAT.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XBAT.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone AAA, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XBAT.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XBAT.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer