XBAT.DE vs. LYS4.DE
XBAT.DE (Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF) and LYS4.DE (Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc) are both European Government Bonds funds - XBAT.DE tracks the iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone AAA while LYS4.DE tracks the MTS Mid Price Highest Rated Macro-Weighted 1-3 (EUR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XBAT.DE returned -0.93%/yr vs -0.21%/yr for LYS4.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XBAT.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for LYS4.DE.
Performance
XBAT.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBAT.DE achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than LYS4.DE's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, XBAT.DE has underperformed LYS4.DE with an annualized return of -0.93%, while LYS4.DE has yielded a comparatively higher -0.21% annualized return.
XBAT.DE
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 1.01%
- 3Y*
- 2.22%
- 5Y*
- -2.38%
- 10Y*
- -0.93%
LYS4.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 0.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- -0.21%
XBAT.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBAT.DE Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF | -0.07% | 2.47% | 0.18% | 3.80% | -17.06% | -2.84% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 2.37% | -1.51% |
LYS4.DE Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc | 0.05% | 1.96% | 2.50% | 2.85% | -5.26% | -0.98% | -0.68% | -0.79% | -0.48% | -1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBAT.DE and LYS4.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2012 | 0.72 |
The correlation between XBAT.DE and LYS4.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBAT.DE vs. LYS4.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XBAT.DE
LYS4.DE
XBAT.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF (XBAT.DE) and Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYS4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBAT.DE | LYS4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.09 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 0.44 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 1.30 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBAT.DE | LYS4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 0.43 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | 0.16 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | -0.14 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | -0.01 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
XBAT.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBAT.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, which is greater than LYS4.DE's maximum drawdown of -9.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAT.DE and LYS4.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBAT.DE | LYS4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.48% | -9.86% | -14.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.01% | -1.32% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.50% | -1.32% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.97% | -6.58% | -15.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.48% | -9.86% | -14.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.49% | -2.29% | -14.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -2.57% | -4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.45% | +0.22% |
Volatility
XBAT.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF (XBAT.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYS4.DE) at 0.46%. This indicates that XBAT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYS4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBAT.DE | LYS4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 0.46% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.93% | 1.24% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23% | 1.35% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 1.72% | +4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 1.43% | +3.96% |
XBAT.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBAT.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LYS4.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XBAT.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBAT.DE nor LYS4.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XBAT.DE and LYS4.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBAT.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBAT.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for LYS4.DE.
XBAT.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone AAA, while LYS4.DE tracks MTS Mid Price Highest Rated Macro-Weighted 1-3 (EUR). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XBAT.DE and 0.17% for LYS4.DE.
Find the right allocation for XBAT.DE and LYS4.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer