XBAS.DE vs. RQFI.DE
XBAS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc)) and RQFI.DE (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XBAS.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Investable Market Index, while RQFI.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XBAS.DE returned 7.93%/yr vs 5.22%/yr for RQFI.DE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBAS.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RQFI.DE.
Performance
XBAS.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XBAS.DE having a 11.06% return and RQFI.DE slightly higher at 11.19%. Over the past 10 years, XBAS.DE has outperformed RQFI.DE with an annualized return of 7.93%, while RQFI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 5.22% annualized return.
XBAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
RQFI.DE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 34.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.86%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
XBAS.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBAS.DE Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.06% | 15.70% | 34.37% | 0.79% | -4.51% | 12.71% | -13.87% | 19.13% | -5.74% | 17.31% |
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 11.19% | 11.14% | 22.23% | -16.63% | -21.95% | 7.70% | 24.38% | 37.47% | -24.90% | 16.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBAS.DE and RQFI.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2014 | 0.39 |
The correlation between XBAS.DE and RQFI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBAS.DE vs. RQFI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XBAS.DE
RQFI.DE
XBAS.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBAS.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBAS.DE | RQFI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 5.96 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 14.95 | -6.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBAS.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, smaller than the maximum RQFI.DE drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAS.DE and RQFI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBAS.DE | RQFI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.43% | -51.79% | +15.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -5.84% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.54% | -27.47% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.54% | -41.42% | +20.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.43% | -45.24% | +8.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -11.17% | +10.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -28.23% | +17.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.33% | +0.53% |
Volatility
XBAS.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBAS.DE) is 3.95%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that XBAS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQFI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBAS.DE | RQFI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 7.49% | -3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 12.29% | -2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 16.74% | -3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 21.11% | -5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 21.86% | -5.31% |
XBAS.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBAS.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RQFI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBAS.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Dividend Comparison
XBAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.43% | 1.84% | 1.40% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 0.90% | 1.32% | 0.75% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.81% | 0.37% |
XBAS.DE Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBAS.DE and RQFI.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBAS.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.DE.
XBAS.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while RQFI.DE is China Equities. XBAS.DE tracks MSCI Singapore Investable Market Index, while RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XBAS.DE and 0.65% for RQFI.DE.
Find the right allocation for XBAS.DE and RQFI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer