XB4A.DE vs. AMED.DE
XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XB4A.DE returned 17.96%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for AMED.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XB4A.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XB4A.DE achieves a 26.47% return, which is significantly higher than AMED.DE's 21.48% return.
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 25.41%
- YTD
- 26.47%
- 1Y
- 51.75%
- 3Y*
- 31.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 20.74%
- YTD
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 32.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
XB4A.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 26.47% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 1.67% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 21.48% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | -1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XB4A.DE and AMED.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017 | 0.75 |
The correlation between XB4A.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XB4A.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XB4A.DE
AMED.DE
XB4A.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XB4A.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.39 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 3.03 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 11.69 | +4.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XB4A.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XB4A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB4A.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XB4A.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -38.35% | -15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -10.56% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -14.07% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.50% | -24.06% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | 0.00% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -5.59% | -4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 2.75% | +0.45% |
Volatility
XB4A.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) at 3.37%. This indicates that XB4A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XB4A.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 3.37% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 12.92% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.53% | 15.17% | +2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 15.88% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 17.35% | +2.86% |
XB4A.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XB4A.DE and AMED.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XB4A.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XB4A.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XB4A.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XB4A.DE and AMED.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi.
Find the right allocation for XB4A.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer