XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

XAUS.L (Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D) and XCTE.L (Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XAUS.L is a Australia Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia NR USD, while XCTE.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XAUS.L returned 10.55%/yr vs 8.73%/yr for XCTE.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XAUS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for XCTE.L.

Performance

XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L) and Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XAUS.L is traded in GBp, while XCTE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XCTE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAUS.L achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than XCTE.L's -1.05% return.

XAUS.L

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 0.58%
• 6M: 6.27%
• YTD: 6.54%
• 1Y: 13.95%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: 7.50%

XCTE.L

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -3.78%
• 6M: -5.18%
• YTD: -1.05%
• 1Y: 19.78%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XAUS.L Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D	6.54%	10.21%	2.65%	5.67%	-5.88%
XCTE.L Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C	-1.05%	25.53%	15.82%	-19.45%	7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XAUS.L and XCTE.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2022	0.38

XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XAUS.L	XCTE.L
Financial Services	33.3%	1.2%
Basic Materials	27.1%	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	22.0%
Industrials	6.3%	11.0%
Real Estate	5.9%	1.1%
Healthcare	4.9%	2.7%
Energy	4.7%	0.3%
Communication Services	3.5%	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	0.3%
Technology	2.5%	33.2%
Utilities	1.4%	4.9%

Return for Risk

XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAUS.L

XAUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 32
XAUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
XAUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
XAUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 32
XAUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
XAUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

XCTE.L

XCTE.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
XCTE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XCTE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XCTE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
XCTE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
XCTE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L) and Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XAUS.L	XCTE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	0.87	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	1.34	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.16	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	1.27	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.00	2.55	+1.45

XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the XCTE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAUS.L and XCTE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAUS.L drawdown since its inception was -75.97%, which is greater than XCTE.L's maximum drawdown of -48.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAUS.L and XCTE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAUS.L	XCTE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.97%	-48.31%	-27.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	-15.87%	+6.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.54%	-31.87%	+10.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.58%	-11.38%	+5.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.01%	-23.55%	-1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	7.94%	-4.46%

Volatility

XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L) is 3.78%, while Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that XAUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCTE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAUS.L	XCTE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	8.18%	-4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.81%	16.87%	-6.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.16%	23.32%	-10.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	29.32%	-13.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.50%	29.32%	-10.82%

XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAUS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XCTE.L's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAUS.L vs. XCTE.L - Dividend Comparison

XAUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while XCTE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
XAUS.L Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D	2.57%	2.67%	3.24%	3.83%	5.17%	2.15%	4.90%	3.73%	3.53%	3.49%	3.75%
XCTE.L Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAUS.L and XCTE.L in my portfolio?

XAUS.L and XCTE.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XAUS.L or XCTE.L?

On fees, XCTE.L is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAUS.L or XCTE.L?

XCTE.L is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XAUS.L.

What is the main difference between XAUS.L and XCTE.L?

XAUS.L is categorized as Australia Equities, while XCTE.L is Technology Equities. XAUS.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while XCTE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAUS.L and 0.44% for XCTE.L.