XAUG vs. DNOV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV).

XAUG and DNOV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XAUG is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Aug 17, 2023. DNOV is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Nov 15, 2019.

Performance

XAUG vs. DNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XAUG vs. DNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August	-0.84%	9.48%	9.02%	5.22%
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November	-1.91%	13.93%	10.71%	6.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAUG achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly higher than DNOV's -1.91% return.

XAUG

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: -0.84%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 8.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DNOV

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -2.36%
• YTD: -1.91%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 14.29%
• 3Y*: 11.81%
• 5Y*: 6.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAUG vs. DNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XAUG and DNOV have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

XAUG

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August

DNOV

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November

Return for Risk

XAUG vs. DNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAUG

XAUG Risk / Return Rank: 61
XAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
XAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
XAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
XAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

DNOV

DNOV Risk / Return Rank: 86
DNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAUG vs. DNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XAUG	DNOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	1.58	-0.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.33	-0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.38	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	2.38	-1.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.18	12.43	-4.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAUG vs. DNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the DNOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAUG and DNOV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAUG	DNOV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	1.58	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	0.81	+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between XAUG and DNOV is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XAUG vs. DNOV - Dividend Comparison

Neither XAUG nor DNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XAUG vs. DNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAUG drawdown since its inception was -8.70%, smaller than the maximum DNOV drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAUG and DNOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAUG	DNOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.70%	-15.03%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-6.13%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-2.78%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-2.06%	+1.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	1.17%	-0.04%

Volatility

XAUG vs. DNOV - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) have volatilities of 2.64% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAUG	DNOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	2.68%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.87%	4.45%	-0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.24%	9.09%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.67%	7.59%	-0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.67%	9.12%	-2.45%