XAR vs. XLK
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XAR returned 18.01%/yr vs 25.84%/yr for XLK. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
XAR vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 18.01%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.84% annualized return.
XAR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.01%
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
XAR vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 13.40% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and XLK is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011 | 0.55 |
The correlation between XAR and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
XAR vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAR
XLK
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
XAR
XLK
Technology
XAR
XLK
Basic Materials
XAR
-
XLK
-
Communication Services
XAR
-
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
XAR
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
XAR
-
XLK
-
Energy
XAR
-
XLK
Financial Services
XAR
-
XLK
-
Healthcare
XAR
-
XLK
-
Real Estate
XAR
-
XLK
-
Utilities
XAR
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
XLK
XAR vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.52 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.22 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 14.16 | -7.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 3.24 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.96 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 1.06 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.42 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -82.05% | +35.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -15.92% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -25.66% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -33.56% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -33.56% | -12.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -1.00% | -5.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -34.96% | +28.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 4.74% | +1.31% |
Volatility
XAR vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.98%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 6.98% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.39% | 16.68% | +5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.81% | 20.82% | +5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 24.90% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 24.49% | +0.13% |
XAR vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and XLK have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.84% vs 18.01% for XAR. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 18.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.32% for XAR.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while XLK is Technology Equities. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer