XAR vs. TQQQ
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XAR returned 18.45%/yr vs 44.55%/yr for TQQQ. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
XAR vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 47.28% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 18.45%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.55% annualized return.
XAR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 47.28%
- 6M
- 47.23%
- 1Y
- 114.36%
- 3Y*
- 59.79%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 44.55%
XAR vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.10% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 47.28% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and TQQQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.55 |
The correlation between XAR and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
XAR vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAR
TQQQ
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XAR
TQQQ
Technology
XAR
TQQQ
Basic Materials
XAR
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
XAR
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
XAR
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
XAR
-
TQQQ
Energy
XAR
-
TQQQ
Financial Services
XAR
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
XAR
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
XAR
-
TQQQ
Utilities
XAR
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
TQQQ
XAR vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAR | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 2.89 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 9.26 | -2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAR vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -81.66% | +35.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -36.97% | +19.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -58.04% | +38.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -81.66% | +49.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -81.66% | +35.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -11.12% | +6.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -18.51% | +11.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.13% | 11.52% | -5.39% |
Volatility
XAR vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) is 11.46%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 22.79%. This indicates that XAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.46% | 22.79% | -11.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.56% | 41.26% | -17.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 51.24% | -23.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 67.02% | -43.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 66.22% | -41.48% |
XAR vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than TQQQ's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.41% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (22.79%) compared to XAR (11.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.55% vs 18.45% for XAR. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XAR has been the lower-risk option at 11.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.55% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer