PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 47.28% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 18.45%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.55% annualized return.


XAR

1D
-1.55%
1M
7.38%
YTD
16.10%
6M
18.39%
1Y
42.07%
3Y*
33.32%
5Y*
16.58%
10Y*
18.45%

TQQQ

1D
1.99%
1M
2.89%
YTD
47.28%
6M
47.23%
1Y
114.36%
3Y*
59.79%
5Y*
24.34%
10Y*
44.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
16.10%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
47.28%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and TQQQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011

0.55

The correlation between XAR and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

XAR vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAR
TQQQ

Industrials

99.1%
2.8%

Technology

0.8%
53.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Industrials

XAR
99.1%
TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

XAR
0.8%
TQQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

XAR

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

XAR

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XAR

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

XAR

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

XAR

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

XAR

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

XAR

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

XAR

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

XAR

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XARTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.89

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

9.26

-2.45

XAR vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAR vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-81.66%

+35.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-36.97%

+19.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-58.04%

+38.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.40%

-81.66%

+49.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-81.66%

+35.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-11.12%

+6.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-18.51%

+11.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

11.52%

-5.39%

Volatility

XAR vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) is 11.46%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 22.79%. This indicates that XAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.46%

22.79%

-11.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.56%

41.26%

-17.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.85%

51.24%

-23.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.66%

67.02%

-43.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

66.22%

-41.48%

XAR vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAR vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than TQQQ's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.41%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.31%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (22.79%) compared to XAR (11.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.55% vs 18.45% for XAR. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XAR has been the lower-risk option at 11.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.55% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer