XAR vs. MMKT
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital. XAR is passively managed, while MMKT is actively managed. Over the past year, XAR returned 44.15% vs 3.83% for MMKT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MMKT.
Performance
XAR vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.46% return.
XAR
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 9.87%
- YTD
- 16.29%
- 6M
- 20.13%
- 1Y
- 44.15%
- 3Y*
- 35.55%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 18.17%
MMKT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.29% | 46.15% | 7.11% |
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 1.46% | 4.13% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and MMKT is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
MMKT
XAR vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAR | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -60.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 15.22 | -13.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 154.25 | -151.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 915.48 | -908.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAR | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 16.61 | -14.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 17.63 | -16.78 |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and MMKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -0.04% | -46.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -0.02% | -17.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | 0.00% | -4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -0.00% | -6.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 0.00% | +6.05% |
Volatility
XAR vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 0.05% | +9.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.50% | 0.13% | +22.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.90% | 0.23% | +26.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 0.23% | +23.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 0.23% | +24.40% |
XAR vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than MMKT's 3.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 3.73% | 3.98% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and MMKT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs MMKT's -0.04%.
On 1-year performance, XAR leads with 44.15% vs 3.83% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAR has performed better with a 44.15% return vs 3.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.
MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.20% for MMKT.
MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.61 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and MMKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer