XAR vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while KROP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XAR returned 33.32%/yr vs -1.65%/yr for KROP. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

XAR vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 13.17% return.

XAR

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 16.10%
• 6M: 18.39%
• 1Y: 42.07%
• 3Y*: 33.32%
• 5Y*: 16.58%
• 10Y*: 18.45%

KROP

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -4.97%
• YTD: 13.17%
• 6M: 11.49%
• 1Y: 8.94%
• 3Y*: -1.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF	16.10%	46.15%	23.32%	23.79%	-5.02%	-9.49%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	13.17%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and KROP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.53

The correlation between XAR and KROP shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XAR vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XAR	KROP
Industrials	99.1%	38.9%
Technology	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	30.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	24.2%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	4.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XAR vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR

XAR Risk / Return Rank: 49
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 19
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 19
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XAR	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	0.55	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	0.89	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.11	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	0.80	+1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.81	1.76	+5.05

XAR vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XAR vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAR	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.37%	-62.08%	+15.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-11.29%	-5.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.73%	-28.70%	+8.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.32%	-50.58%	+46.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-44.68%	+37.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.13%	5.13%	+1.00%

Volatility

XAR vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 5.14%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAR	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.46%	5.14%	+6.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.56%	12.47%	+11.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.85%	16.37%	+11.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.66%	22.28%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.74%	22.28%	+2.46%

XAR vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAR vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than KROP's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.41%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.31%	0.40%	0.66%	0.54%	0.50%	0.83%	0.63%	0.75%	1.19%	0.76%	1.09%	2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAR and KROP in my portfolio?

XAR and KROP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAR or KROP?

XAR has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to KROP (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs KROP's -62.08%.

Which ETF is better, XAR or KROP?

On 3-year performance, XAR leads with 33.32% vs -1.65% for KROP. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAR or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, XAR has performed better with a 33.32% return vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAR or KROP?

XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAR or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.

What is the main difference between XAR and KROP?

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while KROP is Technology Equities. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.