XAR vs. FBTC
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XAR returned 37.23% vs -39.41% for FBTC. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.
Performance
XAR vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -27.63% return.
XAR
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 37.23%
- 3Y*
- 32.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- 17.82%
FBTC
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -20.97%
- YTD
- -27.63%
- 6M
- -30.29%
- 1Y
- -39.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 12.43% | 46.15% | 28.99% |
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -27.63% | -6.56% | 99.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and FBTC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
FBTC
XAR vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAR | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.86 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | -0.76 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | -1.36 | +7.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAR | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | -0.90 | +2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.27 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and FBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -52.07% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -52.07% | +34.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.35% | -49.59% | +42.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -16.18% | +9.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 28.93% | -22.84% |
Volatility
XAR vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) is 9.09%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 11.77%. This indicates that XAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 11.77% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.58% | 34.55% | -11.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.05% | 44.17% | -17.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 50.26% | -26.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 50.26% | -25.61% |
XAR vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and FBTC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBTC has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to XAR (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs FBTC's -52.07%.
On 1-year performance, XAR leads with 37.23% vs -39.41% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XAR has been the lower-risk option at 9.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAR has performed better with a 37.23% return vs -39.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.
XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.25% for FBTC.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and FBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer