XAPR vs. FLJJ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) and FLJJ (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XAPR returned 7.78% vs 14.55% for FLJJ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FLJJ.

Performance

XAPR vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAPR achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than FLJJ's 5.12% return.

XAPR

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 7.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLJJ

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 5.12%
• 6M: 5.26%
• 1Y: 14.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAPR vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	2.92%	12.57%	8.57%
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	5.12%	11.35%	12.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XAPR and FLJJ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024	0.83

The correlation between XAPR and FLJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XAPR vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAPR

XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 95
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FLJJ

FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 90
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAPR vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XAPR	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.28	3.07	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.06	4.75	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	1.65	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.13	3.79	+2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	42.73	20.02	+22.71

XAPR vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is comparable to the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAPR and FLJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XAPR vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAPR drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum FLJJ drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAPR and FLJJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAPR	FLJJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-6.91%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.27%	-3.86%	+2.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.25%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-0.77%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	0.73%	-0.55%

Volatility

XAPR vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) at 1.28%. This indicates that XAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAPR	FLJJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.53%	1.28%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.95%	3.76%	-1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39%	4.83%	-2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.18%	6.19%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.18%	6.19%	-0.01%

XAPR vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJJ's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAPR vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither XAPR nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAPR and FLJJ in my portfolio?

XAPR and FLJJ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAPR or FLJJ?

XAPR has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to FLJJ (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAPR dropped -6.18% vs FLJJ's -6.91%.

Which ETF is better, XAPR or FLJJ?

On 1-year performance, FLJJ leads with 14.55% vs 7.78% for XAPR. On fees, FLJJ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FLJJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAPR or FLJJ?

Over the 1-year period, FLJJ has performed better with a 14.55% return vs 7.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAPR or FLJJ?

FLJJ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAPR or FLJJ?

XAPR and FLJJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XAPR and FLJJ?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XAPR and 0.74% for FLJJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 3.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.