PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAPR vs. DIVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAPR vs. DIVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAPR achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than DIVN's 14.80% return.


XAPR

1D
0.33%
1M
0.63%
6M
3.83%
YTD
4.23%
1Y
7.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.24%

DIVN

1D
0.20%
1M
1.14%
6M
8.07%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.90M$5.41M$2.61M
$56.25K$52.19K$206.39K

XAPR vs. DIVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XAPR and DIVN is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAPR vs. DIVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVN
DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XAPR vs. DIVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XAPRDIVNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.39

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.05

4.08

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.36

11.49

+23.87

XAPR vs. DIVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAPR Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the DIVN Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAPR and DIVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAPR vs. DIVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAPR drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, which is greater than DIVN's maximum drawdown of -5.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAPR and DIVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAPRDIVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-5.55%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.27%

-5.55%

+4.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.39%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.19%

-1.35%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

1.97%

-1.75%

Volatility

XAPR vs. DIVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) is 1.23%, while Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that XAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAPRDIVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

3.15%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.30%

7.55%

-5.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62%

10.52%

-7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

10.53%

-4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.09%

10.53%

-4.44%

XAPR vs. DIVN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAPR vs. DIVN - Dividend Comparison

XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XAPR and DIVN have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVN has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to XAPR (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAPR dropped -6.18% vs DIVN's -5.55%.

On 1-year performance, DIVN leads with 22.54% vs 7.90% for XAPR. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVN has performed better with a 22.54% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

DIVN has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

XAPR is categorized as Options Trading, while DIVN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XAPR and 0.70% for DIVN.

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAPR and DIVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer