XAPR vs. COMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAPR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XAPR returned 8.79% vs 47.51% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. XAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.

Performance

XAPR vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAPR achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.

XAPR

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 6M: 4.05%
• 1Y: 8.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 39.06%
• 1Y: 47.51%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAPR vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	3.39%	12.57%	8.25%
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	39.67%	6.07%	-3.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XAPR and COMT is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024	-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between XAPR and COMT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.24, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

XAPR vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAPR

XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 71
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAPR vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XAPR	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.31	2.24	+2.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	7.30	2.88	+4.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.06	1.40	+0.66
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.37	5.95	+7.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	70.60	14.11	+56.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAPR vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.31, which is higher than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAPR and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAPR	COMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31	2.24	+2.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	0.20	+1.68

Drawdowns

XAPR vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAPR drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAPR and COMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAPR	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-51.89%	+45.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.66%	-8.02%	+7.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-4.82%	+4.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-24.07%	+23.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.12%	3.38%	-3.26%

Volatility

XAPR vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) is 0.75%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that XAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAPR	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	7.37%	-6.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.31%	18.80%	-17.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05%	21.29%	-19.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.18%	21.06%	-14.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.18%	18.89%	-12.71%

XAPR vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAPR vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	5.54%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAPR and COMT in my portfolio?

XAPR and COMT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAPR or COMT?

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to XAPR (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAPR dropped -6.18% vs COMT's -51.89%.

Which ETF is better, XAPR or COMT?

On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 8.79% for XAPR. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAPR or COMT?

Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAPR or COMT?

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAPR or COMT?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

What is the main difference between XAPR and COMT?

XAPR is categorized as Options Trading, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XAPR and 0.48% for COMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.