XAIX vs. THNQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - XAIX tracks the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index while THNQ tracks the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XAIX returned 41.00% vs 55.63% for THNQ. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XAIX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.

Performance

XAIX vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAIX achieves a 23.93% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 33.15% return.

XAIX

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: -2.20%
• 6M: 21.95%
• YTD: 23.93%
• 1Y: 41.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.89%

THNQ

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: -4.13%
• 6M: 31.35%
• YTD: 33.15%
• 1Y: 55.63%
• 3Y*: 30.82%
• 5Y*: 14.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	$1.82M	$1.71M	$2.47M
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	$920.82K	$1.57M	$1.97M

XAIX vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	23.93%	29.05%	15.21%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	33.15%	29.83%	16.27%

Correlation

The correlation between XAIX and THNQ is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	0.90

The correlation between XAIX and THNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

XAIX vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XAIX	THNQ
Technology	79.0%	78.5%
Communication Services	10.4%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	11.1%
Financial Services	4.4%	0.9%
Industrials	0.1%	1.3%
Healthcare	0.0%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-
Real Estate	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

XAIX vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XAIX

XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 60
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XAIX vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XAIX	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.70	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	2.26	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.28	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	2.78	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	7.92	-1.22

XAIX vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAIX and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XAIX vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAIX drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum THNQ drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAIX and THNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAIX	THNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.95%	-50.56%	+26.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.95%	-18.39%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.74%	-9.60%	-3.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-14.88%	+10.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.59%	6.45%	-0.86%

Volatility

XAIX vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) is 9.18%, while ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that XAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAIX	THNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.18%	9.75%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.99%	24.75%	-1.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.88%	30.08%	-4.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	29.80%	-4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.09%	28.97%	-3.88%

XAIX vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAIX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAIX vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

XAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, more than THNQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%	0.00%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	0.42%	0.54%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAIX and THNQ in my portfolio?

XAIX and THNQ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAIX or THNQ?

THNQ has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to XAIX (9.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAIX dropped -23.95% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

Which ETF is better, XAIX or THNQ?

On 1-year performance, THNQ leads with 55.63% vs 41.00% for XAIX. On fees, XAIX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XAIX has been the lower-risk option at 9.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAIX or THNQ?

Over the 1-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 55.63% return vs 41.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAIX or THNQ?

XAIX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAIX or THNQ?

XAIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between XAIX and THNQ?

XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index, while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAIX and 0.68% for THNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.