XAGG vs. RMIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) and RMIF (LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAGG charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for RMIF.

Performance

XAGG vs. RMIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGG achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly higher than RMIF's -0.85% return.

XAGG

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMIF

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 6M: -0.51%
• 1Y: 3.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAGG vs. RMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	1.93%	1.61%
RMIF LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF	-0.85%	0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XAGG and RMIF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

XAGG vs. RMIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMIF

RMIF Risk / Return Rank: 30
RMIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
RMIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
RMIF Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RMIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
RMIF Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAGG vs. RMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAGG	RMIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	1.90	-0.02

Drawdowns

XAGG vs. RMIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGG drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, roughly equal to the maximum RMIF drawdown of -3.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG and RMIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAGG	RMIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-3.01%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-1.31%	+0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.57%	-0.38%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XAGG	RMIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48%	2.63%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.48%	2.59%	+0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.48%	2.59%	+0.89%

XAGG vs. RMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAGG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RMIF's 1.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAGG vs. RMIF - Dividend Comparison

XAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than RMIF's 5.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RMIF LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF	5.30%	5.70%	6.61%	3.70%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	3.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAGG and RMIF in my portfolio?

XAGG and RMIF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XAGG or RMIF?

On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAGG or RMIF?

XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RMIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAGG or RMIF?

RMIF has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 3.86% for XAGG.

What is the main difference between XAGG and RMIF?

They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Little Harbor Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAGG and 1.38% for RMIF.