PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAGG vs. MULT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAGG vs. MULT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGG achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly higher than MULT's 0.83% return.


XAGG

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.93%
6M
2.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULT

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAGG vs. MULT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XAGG and MULT is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAGG vs. MULT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XAGG vs. MULT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAGGMULTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.88

1.35

+0.53

Drawdowns

XAGG vs. MULT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGG drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, which is greater than MULT's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG and MULT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAGGMULTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-1.70%

-1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.48%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.57%

-0.31%

-0.26%

Volatility

XAGG vs. MULT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAGGMULTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

2.95%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.48%

2.95%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.48%

2.95%

+0.53%

XAGG vs. MULT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAGG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MULT's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAGG vs. MULT - Dividend Comparison

XAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than MULT's 3.41% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XAGG and MULT have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MULT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MULT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XAGG.

XAGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 3.41% for MULT.

They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAGG and 0.39% for MULT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAGG and MULT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer