XAGG vs. EVTR
XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) and EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAGG is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while EVTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Both are actively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XAGG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for EVTR.
Performance
XAGG vs. EVTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAGG achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly higher than EVTR's -0.42% return.
XAGG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EVTR
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 2.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.87M | $22.94M | $25.52M | |
| $9.69M | $13.10M | $11.08M |
XAGG vs. EVTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 2.19% | 1.75% |
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | -0.42% | 0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAGG and EVTR is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAGG vs. EVTR — Risk / Return Rank
XAGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EVTR
XAGG vs. EVTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAGG | EVTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAGG vs. EVTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAGG drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum EVTR drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG and EVTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAGG | EVTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -4.08% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -2.14% | +1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -0.99% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.06% | — |
Volatility
XAGG vs. EVTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAGG | EVTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42% | 3.76% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.42% | 4.30% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.42% | 4.30% | -0.88% |
XAGG vs. EVTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAGG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EVTR's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAGG vs. EVTR - Dividend Comparison
XAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than EVTR's 4.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | 4.81% | 4.51% | 4.26% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 5.07% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAGG and EVTR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVTR is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVTR is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XAGG.
XAGG has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 4.81% for EVTR.
XAGG is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while EVTR is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAGG and 0.32% for EVTR.
Find the right allocation for XAGG and EVTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer