PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAGG.TO vs. SPAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAGG.TO vs. SPAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) and SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XAGG.TO is traded in CAD, while SPAB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPAB values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGG.TO achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than SPAB's 1.57% return.


XAGG.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.87%
YTD
0.76%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
10Y*

SPAB

1D
0.29%
1M
2.31%
YTD
1.57%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
2.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAGG.TO vs. SPAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XAGG.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF
0.76%1.84%10.40%1.08%-6.23%-1.74%
SPAB
SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF
1.57%2.33%9.94%3.24%-6.85%-2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between XAGG.TO and SPAB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2021

0.45

Over the past year, XAGG.TO and SPAB have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.45, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAGG.TO vs. SPAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAGG.TO
XAGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
XAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SPAB
SPAB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SPAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPAB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPAB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAGG.TO vs. SPAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) and SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAGG.TOSPABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.50

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

3.44

+0.23

XAGG.TO vs. SPAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the SPAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAGG.TO and SPAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAGG.TOSPABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.22

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.43

-0.21

Drawdowns

XAGG.TO vs. SPAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.43%, smaller than the maximum SPAB drawdown of -19.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG.TO and SPAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAGG.TOSPABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.43%

-19.67%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.06%

-4.41%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-6.77%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-1.50%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-6.37%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

1.92%

+1.64%

Volatility

XAGG.TO vs. SPAB - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB) at 1.28%. This indicates that XAGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAGG.TOSPABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

1.28%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

4.19%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.87%

5.43%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.62%

7.71%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.62%

8.11%

+1.51%

XAGG.TO vs. SPAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAGG.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPAB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XAGG.TO vs. SPAB - Dividend Comparison

XAGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than SPAB's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPAB
SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF
4.05%3.97%3.86%3.34%2.59%2.11%2.43%2.92%2.96%2.67%2.63%2.59%
XAGG.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF
4.10%3.86%3.07%2.59%1.67%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAGG.TO and SPAB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPAB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPAB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for XAGG.TO.

XAGG.TO tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while SPAB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XAGG.TO and 0.03% for SPAB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAGG.TO and SPAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer