SPAB vs. CMBS
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS).
SPAB and CMBS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPAB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate. It was launched on May 23, 2007. CMBS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. CMBS (ERISA Only) Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 2012. Both SPAB and CMBS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPAB or CMBS.
Correlation
The correlation between SPAB and CMBS is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
SPAB vs. CMBS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SPAB:
1.02
CMBS:
1.59
SPAB:
1.50
CMBS:
2.36
SPAB:
1.18
CMBS:
1.29
SPAB:
0.44
CMBS:
0.84
SPAB:
2.58
CMBS:
5.77
SPAB:
2.11%
CMBS:
1.34%
SPAB:
5.35%
CMBS:
4.91%
SPAB:
-18.56%
CMBS:
-16.07%
SPAB:
-7.11%
CMBS:
-2.02%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPAB achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly lower than CMBS's 3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SPAB has underperformed CMBS with an annualized return of 1.48%, while CMBS has yielded a comparatively higher 2.04% annualized return.
SPAB
2.22%
0.29%
1.33%
5.42%
-0.81%
1.48%
CMBS
3.25%
0.94%
3.60%
7.75%
0.66%
2.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPAB vs. CMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPAB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CMBS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPAB vs. CMBS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SPAB
CMBS
SPAB vs. CMBS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPAB vs. CMBS - Dividend Comparison
SPAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than CMBS's 3.35% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPAB SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.91% | 3.86% | 3.34% | 2.59% | 2.11% | 2.43% | 2.92% | 2.96% | 2.67% | 2.63% | 2.59% | 2.43% |
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 3.35% | 3.31% | 2.97% | 2.65% | 2.23% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.70% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.31% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
SPAB vs. CMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPAB drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, which is greater than CMBS's maximum drawdown of -16.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAB and CMBS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPAB vs. CMBS - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) at 1.17%. This indicates that SPAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.