XAGG.TO vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XAGG.TO (iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAGG.TO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XAGG.TO returned 5.87% vs -36.45% for IBIT. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. XAGG.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

XAGG.TO vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XAGG.TO is traded in CAD, while IBIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBIT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGG.TO achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.70% return.

XAGG.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 6M: -0.88%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: 4.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -14.86%
• YTD: -22.70%
• 6M: -28.42%
• 1Y: -36.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAGG.TO vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAGG.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF	0.76%	1.84%	10.63%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-24.53%	-10.70%	113.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XAGG.TO and IBIT is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	-0.06

Return for Risk

XAGG.TO vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAGG.TO

XAGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 33
XAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
XAGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
XAGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
XAGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
XAGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAGG.TO vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XAGG.TO	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	-0.85	+2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	-1.14	+2.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.87	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	-0.73	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.67	-1.26	+4.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAGG.TO vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAGG.TO and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAGG.TO	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	-0.85	+2.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.36	-0.14

Drawdowns

XAGG.TO vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.43%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -50.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG.TO and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAGG.TO	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.43%	-50.21%	+37.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.06%	-50.21%	+46.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-47.02%	+45.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-15.94%	+11.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	28.98%	-25.42%

Volatility

XAGG.TO vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) is 1.83%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that XAGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAGG.TO	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.83%	9.30%	-7.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.22%	34.11%	-29.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.87%	43.02%	-37.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.62%	49.53%	-39.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.62%	49.53%	-39.91%

XAGG.TO vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAGG.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XAGG.TO vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

XAGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XAGG.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF	4.10%	3.86%	3.07%	2.59%	1.67%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAGG.TO and IBIT in my portfolio?

XAGG.TO and IBIT have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XAGG.TO or IBIT?

On fees, XAGG.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAGG.TO or IBIT?

XAGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between XAGG.TO and IBIT?

XAGG.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. XAGG.TO tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XAGG.TO and 0.25% for IBIT.