XAGG.TO vs. FBND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XAGG.TO (iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAGG.TO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. XAGG.TO is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XAGG.TO returned 4.71%/yr vs 5.92%/yr for FBND. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XAGG.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.

Performance

XAGG.TO vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XAGG.TO is traded in CAD, while FBND is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FBND values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGG.TO achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 1.78% return.

XAGG.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 6M: -0.88%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: 4.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBND

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.32%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: -0.09%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: 5.92%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: 3.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAGG.TO vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XAGG.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF	0.76%	1.84%	10.40%	1.08%	-6.23%	-1.74%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	1.78%	2.63%	10.91%	4.46%	-6.31%	-1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XAGG.TO and FBND is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2021	0.43

Over the past year, XAGG.TO and FBND have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

XAGG.TO vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAGG.TO

XAGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 33
XAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
XAGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
XAGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
XAGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
XAGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 40
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAGG.TO vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XAGG.TO	FBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	1.85	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.23	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.63	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.67	3.75	-0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAGG.TO vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAGG.TO and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAGG.TO	FBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.55	-0.33

Drawdowns

XAGG.TO vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.43%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG.TO and FBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAGG.TO	FBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.43%	-15.99%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.06%	-4.29%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.98%	-6.71%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.86%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-15.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-1.27%	-0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-4.72%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	1.86%	+1.70%

Volatility

XAGG.TO vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.34%. This indicates that XAGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAGG.TO	FBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.83%	1.34%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.22%	4.20%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.87%	5.43%	+0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.62%	7.47%	+2.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.62%	7.96%	+1.66%

XAGG.TO vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAGG.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAGG.TO vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

XAGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than FBND's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.70%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%
XAGG.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF	4.10%	3.86%	3.07%	2.59%	1.67%	1.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAGG.TO and FBND in my portfolio?

XAGG.TO and FBND have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XAGG.TO or FBND?

On fees, XAGG.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAGG.TO or FBND?

XAGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.

What is the main difference between XAGG.TO and FBND?

XAGG.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XAGG.TO and 0.36% for FBND.