X014.DE vs. LCUA.DE
X014.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist) and LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Amundi - X014.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ESG Broad CTB Select while LCUA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, X014.DE returned 7.97%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for LCUA.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. X014.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LCUA.DE.
Performance
X014.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, X014.DE achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly lower than LCUA.DE's 34.02% return.
X014.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 30.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
LCUA.DE
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 34.02%
- 6M
- 36.11%
- 1Y
- 52.75%
- 3Y*
- 24.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
X014.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X014.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 17.09% | 9.40% | 11.53% | 8.83% | -8.81% | 10.80% | 2.05% | 21.84% | -2.93% |
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 34.02% | 18.10% | 18.44% | 3.32% | -14.89% | 1.92% | 15.54% | 22.25% | -10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between X014.DE and LCUA.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018 | 0.63 |
The correlation between X014.DE and LCUA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
X014.DE vs. LCUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
X014.DE
LCUA.DE
X014.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| X014.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 4.33 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.61 | 15.01 | -5.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
X014.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum X014.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than LCUA.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for X014.DE and LCUA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| X014.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -33.14% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -12.12% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | -21.07% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.94% | -28.48% | +10.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -4.43% | +2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -11.95% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.50% | -0.37% |
Volatility
X014.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (X014.DE) is 5.31%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a volatility of 9.97%. This indicates that X014.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| X014.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 9.97% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.46% | 18.99% | -5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 21.56% | -3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 18.89% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 19.66% | -4.00% |
X014.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
X014.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUA.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
X014.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Dividend Comparison
X014.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while LCUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
X014.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 1.57% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 1.85% | 2.23% | 1.47% | 1.79% | 2.06% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
X014.DE and LCUA.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for X014.DE.
X014.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ESG Broad CTB Select, while LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for X014.DE and 0.12% for LCUA.DE.
Find the right allocation for X014.DE and LCUA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer