PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WXET vs. BSJS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WXET vs. BSJS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly higher than BSJS's 1.67% return.


WXET

1D
-5.28%
1M
-17.12%
YTD
21.04%
6M
7.24%
1Y
-11.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSJS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.13%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXET vs. BSJS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WXET
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF
21.04%-37.99%-0.40%
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.67%8.31%-0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between WXET and BSJS is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WXET vs. BSJS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXET
WXET Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WXET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXET Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXET Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WXET Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXET Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJS
BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXET vs. BSJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WXETBSJSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

2.29

-2.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.01

3.56

-3.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.45

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

3.97

-4.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.48

19.33

-19.81

WXET vs. BSJS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXET Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the BSJS Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXET and BSJS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WXETBSJSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

2.29

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.52

-0.90

Drawdowns

WXET vs. BSJS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than BSJS's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and BSJS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WXETBSJSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.31%

-17.73%

-30.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.64%

-1.64%

-34.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.43%

-0.05%

-37.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.50%

-3.99%

-26.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.40%

0.34%

+23.06%

Volatility

WXET vs. BSJS - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) has a higher volatility of 22.01% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) at 0.72%. This indicates that WXET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WXETBSJSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.01%

0.72%

+21.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.70%

2.03%

+37.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.13%

2.84%

+47.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.57%

7.39%

+41.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.57%

7.14%

+41.43%

WXET vs. BSJS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJS's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

WXET vs. BSJS - Dividend Comparison

WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than BSJS's 6.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.27%6.49%7.04%6.75%5.82%4.86%0.75%
WXET
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF
2.08%3.57%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WXET and BSJS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WXET has higher volatility (22.01%) compared to BSJS (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs BSJS's -17.73%.

On 1-year performance, BSJS leads with 6.48% vs -11.24% for WXET. On fees, BSJS is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSJS has performed better with a 6.48% return vs -11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSJS is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WXET.

BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 2.08% for WXET.

WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while BSJS is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.42% for BSJS.

BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WXET and BSJS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer