WXET vs. BSJS
WXET (Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF) and BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WXET is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while BSJS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index. WXET is actively managed, while BSJS is passively managed. Over the past year, WXET returned -11.24% vs 6.48% for BSJS. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. WXET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJS.
Performance
WXET vs. BSJS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly higher than BSJS's 1.67% return.
WXET
- 1D
- -5.28%
- 1M
- -17.12%
- YTD
- 21.04%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- -11.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
WXET vs. BSJS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF | 21.04% | -37.99% | -0.40% |
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.67% | 8.31% | -0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between WXET and BSJS is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WXET vs. BSJS — Risk / Return Rank
WXET
BSJS
WXET vs. BSJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WXET | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | 2.29 | -2.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.01 | 3.56 | -3.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.45 | -0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.97 | -4.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 19.33 | -19.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WXET | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 2.29 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.52 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
WXET vs. BSJS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than BSJS's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and BSJS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WXET | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.31% | -17.73% | -30.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -1.64% | -34.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.43% | -0.05% | -37.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.50% | -3.99% | -26.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.40% | 0.34% | +23.06% |
Volatility
WXET vs. BSJS - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) has a higher volatility of 22.01% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) at 0.72%. This indicates that WXET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WXET | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.01% | 0.72% | +21.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.70% | 2.03% | +37.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.13% | 2.84% | +47.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.57% | 7.39% | +41.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.57% | 7.14% | +41.43% |
WXET vs. BSJS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WXET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJS's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
WXET vs. BSJS - Dividend Comparison
WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than BSJS's 6.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.27% | 6.49% | 7.04% | 6.75% | 5.82% | 4.86% | 0.75% |
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF | 2.08% | 3.57% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WXET and BSJS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WXET has higher volatility (22.01%) compared to BSJS (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs BSJS's -17.73%.
On 1-year performance, BSJS leads with 6.48% vs -11.24% for WXET. On fees, BSJS is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BSJS has performed better with a 6.48% return vs -11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSJS is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WXET.
BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 2.08% for WXET.
WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while BSJS is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WXET and 0.42% for BSJS.
BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WXET and BSJS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer