PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WXCIX vs. IFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WXCIX vs. IFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX) and The India Fund (IFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXCIX achieves a 52.06% return, which is significantly higher than IFN's -9.77% return.


WXCIX

1D
-4.74%
1M
6.57%
YTD
52.06%
6M
54.77%
1Y
82.66%
3Y*
34.69%
5Y*
10Y*

IFN

1D
0.52%
1M
2.66%
YTD
-9.77%
6M
-10.36%
1Y
-16.35%
3Y*
1.68%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXCIX vs. IFN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WXCIX
William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I
52.06%28.21%13.49%15.55%
IFN
The India Fund
-9.77%0.42%-2.26%24.23%

Correlation

The correlation between WXCIX and IFN is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2023

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WXCIX vs. IFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXCIX
WXCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
WXCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
WXCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IFN
IFN Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFN Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXCIX vs. IFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX) and The India Fund (IFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WXCIXIFNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

0.85

+0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.02

-0.63

+6.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.84

-1.28

+22.12

WXCIX vs. IFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXCIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the IFN Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXCIX and IFN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WXCIX vs. IFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXCIX drawdown since its inception was -19.66%, smaller than the maximum IFN drawdown of -71.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXCIX and IFN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WXCIXIFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.66%

-71.52%

+51.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-26.05%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.66%

-31.53%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.74%

-24.55%

+19.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-25.88%

+22.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

12.80%

-8.55%

Volatility

WXCIX vs. IFN - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX) has a higher volatility of 13.70% compared to The India Fund (IFN) at 5.63%. This indicates that WXCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WXCIXIFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.70%

5.63%

+8.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.12%

14.13%

+8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.76%

16.72%

+9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.22%

17.76%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

18.89%

+0.33%

WXCIX vs. IFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WXCIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IFN's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

WXCIX vs. IFN - Dividend Comparison

WXCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than IFN's 18.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFN
The India Fund
18.81%16.09%14.60%8.97%21.47%15.21%9.77%11.57%22.25%12.11%7.97%8.02%
WXCIX
William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I
3.63%5.52%0.00%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WXCIX and IFN have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WXCIX has higher volatility (13.70%) compared to IFN (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXCIX dropped -19.66% vs IFN's -71.52%.

WXCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WXCIX and IFN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer