PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WWWFX vs. GTTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WWWFX vs. GTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) and Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWWFX achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than GTTIX's 19.77% return. Over the past 10 years, WWWFX has outperformed GTTIX with an annualized return of 14.91%, while GTTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.20% annualized return.


WWWFX

1D
-3.26%
1M
-11.38%
YTD
-7.07%
6M
-12.13%
1Y
-21.06%
3Y*
26.31%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
14.91%

GTTIX

1D
0.51%
1M
9.02%
YTD
19.77%
6M
23.29%
1Y
42.94%
3Y*
25.57%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWWFX vs. GTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WWWFX
Kinetics Internet No Load
-7.07%-9.04%76.42%29.74%-24.28%15.35%56.42%26.44%-26.97%56.61%
GTTIX
Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I
19.77%27.42%14.93%22.82%-28.59%5.17%16.44%16.44%-11.28%14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WWWFX and GTTIX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between WWWFX and GTTIX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WWWFX vs. GTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWWFX
WWWFX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
WWWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
WWWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GTTIX
GTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWWFX vs. GTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) and Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WWWFXGTTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.53

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

4.71

-5.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

11.99

-13.25

WWWFX vs. GTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWWFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the GTTIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWWFX and GTTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WWWFXGTTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

3.05

-3.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.48

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.50

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.48

+0.05

Drawdowns

WWWFX vs. GTTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWWFX drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, which is greater than GTTIX's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWWFX and GTTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WWWFXGTTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.71%

-39.84%

-35.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.95%

-9.08%

-22.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.95%

-15.74%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.65%

-39.84%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

-39.84%

-2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.93%

0.00%

-27.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-8.15%

-23.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.94%

3.56%

+12.38%

Volatility

WWWFX vs. GTTIX - Volatility Comparison

Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX) at 4.87%. This indicates that WWWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WWWFXGTTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

4.87%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.94%

10.57%

+12.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.95%

14.00%

+14.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.86%

16.40%

+11.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.76%

16.41%

+10.35%

WWWFX vs. GTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WWWFX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than GTTIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

WWWFX vs. GTTIX - Dividend Comparison

WWWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than GTTIX's 14.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTTIX
Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I
14.97%17.94%0.00%0.32%2.29%6.74%3.09%7.22%6.96%7.11%7.34%8.62%
WWWFX
Kinetics Internet No Load
1.94%1.81%0.94%0.75%0.84%0.85%0.00%1.45%39.59%18.48%8.72%27.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


WWWFX and GTTIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WWWFX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to GTTIX (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWWFX dropped -75.71% vs GTTIX's -39.84%.

GTTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WWWFX and GTTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer