WWWFX vs. WWNPX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

WWWFX (Kinetics Internet No Load) and WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) are both mutual funds - WWWFX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kinetics, while WWNPX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Kinetics. Over the past 10 years, WWWFX returned 14.67%/yr vs 18.31%/yr for WWNPX. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WWWFX charges 1.71%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for WWNPX.

Performance

WWWFX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWWFX achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 21.61% return. Over the past 10 years, WWWFX has underperformed WWNPX with an annualized return of 14.67%, while WWNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.31% annualized return.

WWWFX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 1.62%
• 6M: -9.77%
• YTD: -7.59%
• 1Y: -21.62%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 14.67%
• ALL TIME*: 14.03%

WWNPX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -1.34%
• 6M: 6.16%
• YTD: 21.61%
• 1Y: 11.71%
• 3Y*: 27.61%
• 5Y*: 14.30%
• 10Y*: 18.31%
• ALL TIME*: 11.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

WWWFX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load	-7.59%	-9.04%	76.42%	29.74%	-24.28%	15.35%	56.42%	26.44%	-26.97%	56.61%
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund	21.61%	-14.61%	88.34%	-16.97%	29.18%	38.14%	3.38%	30.47%	-5.24%	28.41%

Correlation

The correlation between WWWFX and WWNPX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1999	0.72

The correlation between WWWFX and WWNPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WWWFX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WWWFX

WWWFX Risk / Return Rank: 0
WWWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
WWWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
WWWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
WWWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
WWWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

WWNPX

WWNPX Risk / Return Rank: 8
WWNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
WWNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
WWNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
WWNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
WWNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WWWFX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WWWFX	WWNPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.83	0.21	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.08	0.53	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.07	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	0.25	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	0.58	-1.80

WWWFX vs. WWNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWWFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the WWNPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWWFX and WWNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WWWFX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWWFX drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, which is greater than WWNPX's maximum drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWWFX and WWNPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WWWFX	WWNPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.71%	-67.87%	-7.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.51%	-27.71%	-4.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.51%	-41.13%	+8.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.65%	-41.13%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.32%	-43.51%	+1.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.32%	-26.29%	-2.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.32%	-13.98%	-17.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.67%	12.28%	+7.39%

Volatility

WWWFX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kinetics Internet No Load (WWWFX) is 5.12%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that WWWFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WWWFX	WWNPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.12%	7.85%	-2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.53%	26.73%	-5.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.12%	34.28%	-5.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.75%	33.11%	-5.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.87%	28.84%	-1.97%

WWWFX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WWWFX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

WWWFX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison

WWWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than WWNPX's 6.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund	6.75%	8.21%	2.95%	5.65%	2.00%	1.67%	2.15%	1.00%	10.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WWWFX Kinetics Internet No Load	1.95%	1.81%	0.94%	0.75%	0.84%	0.85%	0.00%	1.45%	39.59%	18.48%	8.72%	27.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WWWFX and WWNPX in my portfolio?

WWWFX and WWNPX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WWWFX or WWNPX?

WWNPX has higher volatility (7.85%) compared to WWWFX (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWWFX dropped -75.71% vs WWNPX's -67.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WWNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.