WULX vs. COTG
WULX (Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. WULX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
WULX vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WULX achieves a 238.07% return, which is significantly higher than COTG's 17.32% return.
WULX
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 29.01%
- YTD
- 238.07%
- 6M
- 98.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WULX vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WULX Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF | 238.07% | -37.27% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -18.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between WULX and COTG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WULX vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WULX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | -0.28 | +1.59 |
Drawdowns
WULX vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WULX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULX and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WULX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.48% | -25.69% | -34.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.75% | -23.48% | +18.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.68% | -8.35% | -22.33% |
Volatility
WULX vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WULX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 189.30% | 40.65% | +148.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 189.30% | 40.65% | +148.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 189.30% | 40.65% | +148.65% |
WULX vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WULX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WULX vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither WULX nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WULX and COTG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for WULX.
WULX and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for WULX and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for WULX and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer