PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTV vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTV vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.45% return.


WTV

1D
0.86%
1M
4.50%
YTD
11.47%
6M
12.37%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*

SPMO

1D
-1.46%
1M
10.84%
YTD
28.45%
6M
27.50%
1Y
43.92%
3Y*
42.27%
5Y*
23.92%
10Y*
20.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTV vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
11.47%13.51%23.99%22.35%-8.06%30.59%6.15%29.69%-8.29%1.14%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.45%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between WTV and SPMO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017

0.64

The correlation between WTV and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WTV vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTV
SPMO

Financial Services

19.5%
5.9%

Technology

15.3%
52.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
4.3%

Industrials

10.5%
11.3%

Healthcare

7.3%
6.7%

Communication Services

6.9%
9.2%

Energy

6.8%
3.4%

Real Estate

5.3%
1.0%

Utilities

4.8%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.6%

Financial Services

WTV
19.5%
SPMO
5.9%

Technology

WTV
15.3%
SPMO
52.6%

Consumer Cyclical

WTV
10.7%
SPMO
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

WTV
10.7%
SPMO
4.3%

Industrials

WTV
10.5%
SPMO
11.3%

Healthcare

WTV
7.3%
SPMO
6.7%

Communication Services

WTV
6.9%
SPMO
9.2%

Energy

WTV
6.8%
SPMO
3.4%

Real Estate

WTV
5.3%
SPMO
1.0%

Utilities

WTV
4.8%
SPMO
2.8%

Basic Materials

WTV
2.2%
SPMO
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTV vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTV
WTV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTV vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTVSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.47

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

13.52

-1.98

WTV vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTV and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTVSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.49

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

1.25

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.00

-0.33

Drawdowns

WTV vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTVSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.18%

-30.95%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-12.70%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-20.13%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

-22.74%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.46%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-4.60%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

3.26%

-1.07%

Volatility

WTV vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) is 3.01%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that WTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTVSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

7.39%

-4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

14.49%

-6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

17.70%

-5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

19.30%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

20.31%

-0.11%

WTV vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WTV vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
1.64%1.59%1.54%1.62%2.08%1.55%1.63%1.44%1.94%0.41%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTV and SPMO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to WTV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTV dropped -42.18% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 23.92% vs 13.36% for WTV. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 23.92% return vs 13.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.

WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.66% for SPMO.

WTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. WTV tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WTV and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTV and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer