PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTV vs. AIVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTV vs. AIVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than AIVL's 14.65% return.


WTV

1D
0.14%
1M
0.51%
YTD
10.40%
6M
9.44%
1Y
22.68%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

AIVL

1D
1.99%
1M
3.43%
YTD
14.65%
6M
13.61%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTV vs. AIVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTV
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund
10.40%13.51%23.99%22.35%-8.06%30.59%6.15%29.69%-8.29%1.58%
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
14.65%9.72%13.49%7.17%-7.26%24.30%-5.82%24.40%-9.57%0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between WTV and AIVL is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017

0.87

The correlation between WTV and AIVL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

WTV vs. AIVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTV
AIVL

Financial Services

18.5%
17.9%

Technology

18.3%
21.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
3.1%

Industrials

10.3%
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
7.8%

Healthcare

7.5%
12.0%

Communication Services

6.5%
4.2%

Energy

6.4%
3.1%

Real Estate

5.4%
1.5%

Utilities

4.5%
8.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
4.6%

Financial Services

WTV
18.5%
AIVL
17.9%

Technology

WTV
18.3%
AIVL
21.3%

Consumer Cyclical

WTV
10.6%
AIVL
3.1%

Industrials

WTV
10.3%
AIVL
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

WTV
9.9%
AIVL
7.8%

Healthcare

WTV
7.5%
AIVL
12.0%

Communication Services

WTV
6.5%
AIVL
4.2%

Energy

WTV
6.4%
AIVL
3.1%

Real Estate

WTV
5.4%
AIVL
1.5%

Utilities

WTV
4.5%
AIVL
8.9%

Basic Materials

WTV
2.2%
AIVL
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTV vs. AIVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTV
WTV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTV vs. AIVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTVAIVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.50

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

10.06

+0.25

WTV vs. AIVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTV Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the AIVL Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTV and AIVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTV vs. AIVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, smaller than the maximum AIVL drawdown of -62.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and AIVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTVAIVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.18%

-62.48%

+20.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-7.85%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-14.48%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

-19.08%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

0.00%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-7.89%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.95%

+0.26%

Volatility

WTV vs. AIVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) is 3.37%, while WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that WTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTVAIVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

4.23%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

9.36%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

11.76%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

14.76%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.15%

17.36%

+2.79%

WTV vs. AIVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AIVL's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTV vs. AIVL - Dividend Comparison

WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than AIVL's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.47%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
WTV
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund
1.93%1.59%1.54%1.62%2.08%1.55%1.63%1.44%1.94%0.41%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTV and AIVL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVL has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to WTV (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTV dropped -42.18% vs AIVL's -62.48%.

On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.30% vs 8.42% for AIVL. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AIVL.

WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.47% for AIVL.

Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WTV and 0.38% for AIVL.

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTV and AIVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer