PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTS vs. TSLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WTS vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTS achieves a 21.12% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, WTS has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 20.25%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 39.72% annualized return.


WTS

1D
3.81%
1M
11.26%
YTD
21.12%
6M
19.78%
1Y
38.75%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*
20.25%

TSLA

1D
1.82%
1M
-8.72%
YTD
-9.63%
6M
-11.45%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
39.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTS vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
21.12%36.85%-1.62%43.57%-24.08%60.63%23.14%56.20%-14.13%17.84%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
-9.63%11.36%62.52%101.72%-65.03%49.76%743.44%25.70%6.89%45.70%

Correlation

The correlation between WTS and TSLA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2010

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WTS:

$11.16B

TSLA:

$1.44T

EPS

WTS:

$10.95

TSLA:

$1.10

PE Ratio

WTS:

30.43

TSLA:

370.20

PEG Ratio

WTS:

1.42

TSLA:

45.29

PS Ratio

WTS:

4.36

TSLA:

14.66

PB Ratio

WTS:

5.32

TSLA:

17.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

WTS:

$2.56B

TSLA:

$97.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WTS:

$1.26B

TSLA:

$18.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

WTS:

$556.30M

TSLA:

$10.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTS vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTS
WTS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
WTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
WTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLA
TSLA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TSLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTS vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTSTSLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.13

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

0.92

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

2.10

+4.41

WTS vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTS and TSLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTS vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTS drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, smaller than the maximum TSLA drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTS and TSLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTSTSLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.68%

-73.63%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.45%

-29.93%

+14.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.54%

-53.77%

+34.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.08%

-73.63%

+29.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-73.63%

+29.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-17.03%

+16.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-22.72%

+6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

13.06%

-7.09%

Volatility

WTS vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) is 7.01%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 14.25%. This indicates that WTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTSTSLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

14.25%

-7.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.66%

28.73%

-12.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

44.49%

-21.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

58.98%

-31.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.24%

59.14%

-30.90%

Dividends

WTS vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

WTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
0.66%0.72%0.81%0.66%0.79%0.52%0.76%0.90%1.27%0.99%1.09%1.33%

Financials

WTS vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
677.30M
22.39B
(WTS) Total Revenue
(TSLA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WTS vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Tesla, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.2%
21.1%
Portfolio components
WTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.10M and revenue of 677.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

TSLA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.

WTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.00M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.

TSLA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

WTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 99.60M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

TSLA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WTS and TSLA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLA has higher volatility (14.25%) compared to WTS (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTS dropped -63.68% vs TSLA's -73.63%.

WTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTS and TSLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer