WTRE vs. BLDG
WTRE (WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. WTRE is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, WTRE returned 1.80%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for BLDG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WTRE charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
WTRE vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTRE achieves a 23.34% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's 5.95% return.
WTRE
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 23.34%
- 6M
- 23.21%
- 1Y
- 46.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.90%
BLDG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- —
WTRE vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTRE WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF | 23.34% | 26.36% | -3.27% | 14.07% | -31.68% | 1.00% | 10.25% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.95% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTRE and BLDG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WTRE and BLDG has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WTRE vs. BLDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTRE
BLDG
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
WTRE
BLDG
Communication Services
WTRE
BLDG
-
Technology
WTRE
BLDG
-
Financial Services
WTRE
BLDG
Basic Materials
WTRE
-
BLDG
-
Consumer Cyclical
WTRE
-
BLDG
-
Consumer Defensive
WTRE
-
BLDG
-
Energy
WTRE
-
BLDG
-
Healthcare
WTRE
-
BLDG
-
Industrials
WTRE
-
BLDG
-
Utilities
WTRE
-
BLDG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTRE vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
WTRE
BLDG
WTRE vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF (WTRE) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.16 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 1.02 | +2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 3.60 | +5.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 0.93 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.15 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.45 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
WTRE vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTRE drawdown since its inception was -74.18%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTRE and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.18% | -27.25% | -46.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.22% | -10.08% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -18.57% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.87% | -27.25% | -16.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -2.76% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -9.23% | -15.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 2.86% | +2.26% |
Volatility
WTRE vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF (WTRE) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 3.60%. This indicates that WTRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 3.60% | +2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.84% | 8.23% | +7.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 11.07% | +9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 15.26% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 15.54% | +2.95% |
WTRE vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTRE has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTRE vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
WTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than BLDG's 5.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.72% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTRE WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF | 1.97% | 2.33% | 2.69% | 2.05% | 1.68% | 6.47% | 2.96% | 7.88% | 4.49% | 6.34% | 5.96% | 4.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTRE and BLDG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTRE has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to BLDG (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTRE dropped -74.18% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 5-year performance, BLDG leads with 2.24% vs 1.80% for WTRE. On fees, WTRE is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BLDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 2.24% return vs 1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTRE is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 1.97% for WTRE.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for WTRE and 0.59% for BLDG.
WTRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTRE and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer