WTNR.L vs. XREP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WTNR.L (WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XREP.L (Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP) are both REIT funds - WTNR.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD while XREP.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTNR.L returned 16.68%/yr vs 6.73%/yr for XREP.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WTNR.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XREP.L.

Performance

WTNR.L vs. XREP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTNR.L) and Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTNR.L achieves a 22.49% return, which is significantly higher than XREP.L's 9.29% return.

WTNR.L

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 3.78%
• YTD: 22.49%
• 6M: 19.68%
• 1Y: 46.90%
• 3Y*: 16.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XREP.L

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 9.29%
• 6M: 7.85%
• 1Y: 10.47%
• 3Y*: 6.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTNR.L vs. XREP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WTNR.L WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Acc	22.49%	22.86%	-3.23%	7.76%	1.89%
XREP.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP	9.29%	-3.09%	4.07%	6.60%	1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between WTNR.L and XREP.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between WTNR.L and XREP.L has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WTNR.L vs. XREP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTNR.L

WTNR.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
WTNR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
WTNR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
WTNR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
WTNR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
WTNR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

XREP.L

XREP.L Risk / Return Rank: 17
XREP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
XREP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
XREP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XREP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
XREP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTNR.L vs. XREP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTNR.L) and Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTNR.L	XREP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	0.23	+2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	0.73	+2.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.19	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.77	0.35	+3.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.73	0.52	+9.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTNR.L vs. XREP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTNR.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the XREP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTNR.L and XREP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTNR.L	XREP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	0.23	+2.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.18	+0.30

Drawdowns

WTNR.L vs. XREP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTNR.L drawdown since its inception was -29.28%, roughly equal to the maximum XREP.L drawdown of -29.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTNR.L and XREP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTNR.L	XREP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.28%	-29.50%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.84%	-29.50%	+16.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.61%	-29.50%	+8.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.54%	-21.53%	+18.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.62%	-11.54%	-3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.98%	19.76%	-14.78%

Volatility

WTNR.L vs. XREP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTNR.L) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) at 3.93%. This indicates that WTNR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XREP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTNR.L	XREP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.73%	3.93%	+3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.68%	9.74%	+3.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.55%	44.28%	-24.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.20%	27.43%	-9.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.20%	27.43%	-9.23%

WTNR.L vs. XREP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTNR.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XREP.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTNR.L vs. XREP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTNR.L nor XREP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTNR.L and XREP.L in my portfolio?

WTNR.L and XREP.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WTNR.L or XREP.L?

On fees, XREP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTNR.L or XREP.L?

XREP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WTNR.L.

What is the main difference between WTNR.L and XREP.L?

WTNR.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while XREP.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WTNR.L and 0.14% for XREP.L.