WTMF vs. SMH
WTMF (WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WTMF returned 3.15%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTMF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
WTMF vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, WTMF has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 3.15%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
WTMF
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
WTMF vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 7.65% | 12.17% | 3.20% | 16.72% | -6.52% | 9.48% | 0.48% | -2.75% | 0.24% | -3.40% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMF and SMH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2011 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, WTMF and SMH have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
WTMF vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTMF
SMH
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
WTMF
SMH
-
Technology
WTMF
SMH
Healthcare
WTMF
SMH
-
Financial Services
WTMF
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
WTMF
SMH
-
Real Estate
WTMF
SMH
-
Energy
WTMF
SMH
-
Basic Materials
WTMF
SMH
-
Utilities
WTMF
SMH
-
Communication Services
WTMF
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
WTMF
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMF vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
WTMF
SMH
WTMF vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTMF | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.60 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.05 | 9.18 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.53 | 33.74 | -12.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTMF vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMF | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -84.96% | +54.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.04% | -14.93% | +10.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.93% | -35.74% | +25.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | -45.30% | +32.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.62% | -45.30% | +29.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -2.81% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.67% | -41.04% | +23.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 4.06% | -3.12% |
Volatility
WTMF vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 2.76%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMF | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 16.25% | -13.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 27.73% | -20.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.93% | 33.20% | -24.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.51% | 35.47% | -25.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.10% | 32.82% | -24.72% |
WTMF vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMF vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.83% | 3.04% | 3.57% | 4.74% | 5.29% | 14.71% | 0.47% | 1.63% | 3.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMF and SMH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to WTMF (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 3.15% for WTMF. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTMF.
WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
WTMF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while SMH is Semiconductors. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTMF and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer