PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMF vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMF vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, WTMF has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 3.26%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


WTMF

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.05%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.44%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
3.26%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTMF vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
8.50%12.17%3.20%16.72%-6.52%9.48%0.48%-2.75%0.24%-3.40%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between WTMF and QQQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2011

0.13

Over the past year, WTMF and QQQ have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

WTMF vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTMF
QQQ

Industrials

17.7%
2.8%

Technology

17.0%
53.8%

Healthcare

16.5%
4.2%

Financial Services

15.8%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
12.3%

Real Estate

6.1%
0.1%

Energy

6.1%
0.6%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.1%

Utilities

2.9%
1.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
7.7%

Industrials

WTMF
17.7%
QQQ
2.8%

Technology

WTMF
17.0%
QQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

WTMF
16.5%
QQQ
4.2%

Financial Services

WTMF
15.8%
QQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

WTMF
8.4%
QQQ
12.3%

Real Estate

WTMF
6.1%
QQQ
0.1%

Energy

WTMF
6.1%
QQQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

WTMF
4.8%
QQQ
1.1%

Utilities

WTMF
2.9%
QQQ
1.4%

Communication Services

WTMF
2.4%
QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

WTMF
2.4%
QQQ
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMF vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMF
WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTMF vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTMFQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.45

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

3.51

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.08

13.49

+11.58

WTMF vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMF and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTMFQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.64

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.81

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.99

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.41

-0.26

Drawdowns

WTMF vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMFQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-82.97%

+52.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.04%

-11.96%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.93%

-22.77%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

-35.12%

+21.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.99%

-35.12%

+19.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.26%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-32.79%

+15.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

3.11%

-2.21%

Volatility

WTMF vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 1.61%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMFQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

4.49%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

12.10%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.63%

15.94%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.46%

22.38%

-12.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.07%

22.29%

-14.22%

WTMF vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTMF vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.80%3.04%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMF and QQQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to WTMF (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs 3.26% for WTMF. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTMF.

WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

WTMF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMF and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer