PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTLTX vs. JGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTLTX vs. JGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTLTX achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than JGH's 5.15% return. Over the past 10 years, WTLTX has underperformed JGH with an annualized return of 4.67%, while JGH has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.


WTLTX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.39%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
4.67%

JGH

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.82%
YTD
5.15%
6M
7.13%
1Y
10.84%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTLTX vs. JGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTLTX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund
1.04%7.97%5.53%12.16%-9.75%3.13%7.31%12.21%-2.19%6.19%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
5.15%8.62%15.98%20.89%-21.01%10.84%2.77%30.04%-12.02%15.25%

Correlation

The correlation between WTLTX and JGH is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2014

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTLTX vs. JGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTLTX
WTLTX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
WTLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
WTLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

JGH
JGH Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
JGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGH Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTLTX vs. JGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTLTXJGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.22

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

1.30

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.29

3.16

+13.13

WTLTX vs. JGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTLTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the JGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTLTX and JGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTLTXJGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

1.06

+1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.42

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.53

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.41

+0.68

Drawdowns

WTLTX vs. JGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTLTX drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum JGH drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTLTX and JGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTLTXJGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-43.79%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.76%

-8.37%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.12%

-13.70%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.35%

-28.66%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.97%

-43.79%

+26.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.78%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-7.00%

+3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

3.44%

-3.08%

Volatility

WTLTX vs. JGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) is 0.55%, while Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that WTLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTLTXJGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

3.70%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

7.25%

-5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96%

10.22%

-8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.32%

13.79%

-9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

15.88%

-11.38%

WTLTX vs. JGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTLTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than JGH's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTLTX vs. JGH - Dividend Comparison

WTLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than JGH's 9.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
9.74%9.82%9.67%10.18%12.05%8.19%7.13%7.53%9.88%8.52%9.61%11.44%
WTLTX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund
4.10%4.09%4.21%4.26%4.23%3.41%3.88%4.88%4.76%4.55%4.51%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTLTX and JGH have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGH has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to WTLTX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTLTX dropped -38.46% vs JGH's -43.79%.

WTLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTLTX and JGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer