WTIU vs. TSII
WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and TSII (REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from REX. WTIU is passively managed, while TSII is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSII.
Performance
WTIU vs. TSII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 91.57% return, which is significantly higher than TSII's -6.73% return.
WTIU
- 1D
- 4.02%
- 1M
- -7.74%
- YTD
- 91.57%
- 6M
- 66.33%
- 1Y
- 103.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSII
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- YTD
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -7.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU vs. TSII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 91.57% | 13.07% |
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | -6.73% | 43.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTIU and TSII is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTIU vs. TSII — Risk / Return Rank
WTIU
TSII
WTIU vs. TSII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTIU | TSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTIU | TSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.75 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
WTIU vs. TSII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, which is greater than TSII's maximum drawdown of -29.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and TSII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTIU | TSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.73% | -29.03% | -46.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.10% | -14.76% | -17.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.19% | -9.31% | -29.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.83% | — | — |
Volatility
WTIU vs. TSII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTIU | TSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.51% | 46.04% | +21.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.62% | 46.04% | +24.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.62% | 46.04% | +24.58% |
WTIU vs. TSII - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSII's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTIU vs. TSII - Dividend Comparison
WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | 70.30% | 32.17% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTIU and TSII have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.
TSII has the higher dividend yield at 70.30%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.99% for TSII.
Find the right allocation for WTIU and TSII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer