PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTIU vs. TSII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTIU vs. TSII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 95.37% return, which is significantly higher than TSII's -32.67% return.


WTIU

1D
-4.60%
1M
39.23%
6M
55.77%
YTD
95.37%
1Y
104.76%
3Y*
-1.04%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-5.73%

TSII

1D
3.63%
1M
-19.80%
6M
-28.72%
YTD
-32.67%
1Y
0.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-5.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.40M$1.26M$1.06M
$1.41M$930.94K$851.49K

WTIU vs. TSII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
95.37%6.10%
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
-32.67%39.41%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and TSII is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTIU vs. TSII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

TSII
TSII Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSII Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSII Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TSII Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSII Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WTIU vs. TSII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTIUTSIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.04

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

0.02

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

0.04

+4.95

WTIU vs. TSII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIU Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the TSII Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIU and TSII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. TSII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, which is greater than TSII's maximum drawdown of -44.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and TSII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIUTSIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.73%

-44.14%

-31.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.11%

-44.14%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.75%

-38.47%

+7.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.20%

-11.61%

-27.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.07%

15.94%

+5.13%

Volatility

WTIU vs. TSII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) is 22.17%, while REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) has a volatility of 24.22%. This indicates that WTIU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTIUTSIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.17%

24.22%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.97%

37.70%

+20.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.79%

47.83%

+21.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.86%

50.47%

+20.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.86%

50.47%

+20.39%

WTIU vs. TSII - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSII's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTIU vs. TSII - Dividend Comparison

WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.45%.


PositionTTM2025
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
105.45%32.17%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTIU and TSII have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSII has higher volatility (24.22%) compared to WTIU (22.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIU dropped -75.73% vs TSII's -44.14%.

On 1-year performance, WTIU leads with 104.76% vs 0.68% for TSII. On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WTIU has been the lower-risk option at 22.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 104.76% return vs 0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.

TSII has the higher dividend yield at 105.45%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.99% for TSII.

WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTIU and TSII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer