WTIU vs. NTSD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WTIU is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.63, they often move in opposite directions. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.

Performance

WTIU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WTIU

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -8.81%
• YTD: 87.83%
• 6M: 63.25%
• 1Y: 112.38%
• 3Y*: 5.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NTSD

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	-14.58%
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	19.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and NTSD is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026	-0.63

Return for Risk

WTIU vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 47
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 41
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTIU	NTSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTIU	NTSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	5.46	-5.56

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and NTSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIU	NTSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.73%	-5.20%	-70.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.42%	-0.04%	-33.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.18%	-0.83%	-38.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WTIU	NTSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.43%	24.10%	+43.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.58%	24.10%	+46.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.58%	24.10%	+46.48%

WTIU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTIU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTIU nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIU and NTSD in my portfolio?

WTIU and NTSD have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WTIU or NTSD?

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTIU or NTSD?

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTIU or NTSD?

WTIU and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WTIU and NTSD?

They also come from different issuers: REX and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.35% for NTSD.