WTIU vs. NFLU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WTIU is passively managed, while NFLU is actively managed. Over the past year, WTIU returned 40.86% vs -73.54% for NFLU. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NFLU.

Performance

WTIU vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 48.25% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -46.72% return.

WTIU

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -23.04%
• YTD: 48.25%
• 6M: 48.93%
• 1Y: 40.86%
• 3Y*: 0.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFLU

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -33.62%
• YTD: -46.72%
• 6M: -46.68%
• 1Y: -73.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIU vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	48.25%	-17.13%	-14.46%
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	-46.72%	-12.47%	50.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and NFLU is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024	0.00

Return for Risk

WTIU vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 20
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 21
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 20

NFLU

NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIU vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTIU	NFLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	-1.09	+1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	-2.10	+3.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.74	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	-0.96	+1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	-1.50	+3.80

WTIU vs. NFLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIU Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the NFLU Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIU and NFLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, roughly equal to the maximum NFLU drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and NFLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIU	NFLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.73%	-76.74%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.07%	-76.74%	+29.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.45%	-76.74%	+29.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.19%	-29.18%	-10.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.80%	49.08%	-31.28%

Volatility

WTIU vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a higher volatility of 23.51% compared to T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) at 16.02%. This indicates that WTIU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTIU	NFLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.51%	16.02%	+7.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.01%	50.90%	+5.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.81%	67.87%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.79%	69.06%	+1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.79%	69.06%	+1.73%

WTIU vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTIU vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTIU nor NFLU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIU and NFLU in my portfolio?

WTIU and NFLU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTIU or NFLU?

WTIU has higher volatility (23.51%) compared to NFLU (16.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIU dropped -75.73% vs NFLU's -76.74%.

Which ETF is better, WTIU or NFLU?

On 1-year performance, WTIU leads with 40.86% vs -73.54% for NFLU. On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 16.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTIU or NFLU?

Over the 1-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 40.86% return vs -73.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTIU or NFLU?

WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTIU or NFLU?

WTIU and NFLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WTIU and NFLU?

They also come from different issuers: REX and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 1.05% for NFLU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.