WTIU vs. FEPI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while FEPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. WTIU is passively managed, while FEPI is actively managed. Over the past year, WTIU returned 112.38% vs 32.79% for FEPI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPI.

Performance

WTIU vs. FEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 87.83% return, which is significantly higher than FEPI's 10.45% return.

WTIU

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -8.81%
• YTD: 87.83%
• 6M: 63.25%
• 1Y: 112.38%
• 3Y*: 5.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FEPI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 5.76%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 6M: 11.25%
• 1Y: 32.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIU vs. FEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	87.83%	-17.13%	-29.63%	-14.03%
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	10.45%	18.33%	15.69%	11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and FEPI is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023	0.03

The correlation between WTIU and FEPI shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WTIU vs. FEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WTIU	FEPI
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	24.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	62.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WTIU vs. FEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 47
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 41
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FEPI

FEPI Risk / Return Rank: 56
FEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIU vs. FEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTIU	FEPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.99	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.65	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.36	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.55	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	8.56	-1.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTIU vs. FEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIU Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FEPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIU and FEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTIU	FEPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	1.99	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	1.16	-1.26

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. FEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, which is greater than FEPI's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and FEPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIU	FEPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.73%	-23.56%	-52.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.11%	-12.91%	-26.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.42%	-1.43%	-31.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.18%	-3.50%	-35.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.92%	3.84%	+12.08%

Volatility

WTIU vs. FEPI - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a higher volatility of 27.11% compared to REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) at 3.31%. This indicates that WTIU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTIU	FEPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.11%	3.31%	+23.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.96%	12.54%	+42.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.43%	16.52%	+50.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.58%	19.00%	+51.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.58%	19.00%	+51.58%

WTIU vs. FEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEPI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTIU vs. FEPI - Dividend Comparison

WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	23.91%	25.48%	27.18%	4.21%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIU and FEPI in my portfolio?

WTIU and FEPI have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTIU or FEPI?

WTIU has higher volatility (27.11%) compared to FEPI (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIU dropped -75.73% vs FEPI's -23.56%.

Which ETF is better, WTIU or FEPI?

On 1-year performance, WTIU leads with 112.38% vs 32.79% for FEPI. On fees, FEPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FEPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTIU or FEPI?

Over the 1-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 112.38% return vs 32.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTIU or FEPI?

FEPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTIU or FEPI?

FEPI has the higher dividend yield at 23.91%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

What is the main difference between WTIU and FEPI?

WTIU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FEPI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.65% for FEPI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.