PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTIU vs. EWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTIU vs. EWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 91.57% return, which is significantly higher than EWV's -27.97% return.


WTIU

1D
4.02%
1M
-7.74%
YTD
91.57%
6M
66.33%
1Y
103.25%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
10Y*

EWV

1D
-0.28%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
-27.97%
6M
-29.61%
1Y
-43.86%
3Y*
-28.45%
5Y*
-17.58%
10Y*
-20.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIU vs. EWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
91.57%-17.13%-29.63%-28.42%
EWV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan
-27.97%-37.70%-11.06%-21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and EWV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023

-0.13

The correlation between WTIU and EWV shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTIU vs. EWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

EWV
EWV Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWV Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
EWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWV Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIU vs. EWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTIUEWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.80

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

-0.94

+3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

-1.51

+8.06

WTIU vs. EWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIU Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the EWV Sharpe Ratio of -1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIU and EWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTIUEWVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

-1.11

+2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

-0.47

+0.37

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. EWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, smaller than the maximum EWV drawdown of -99.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and EWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIUEWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.73%

-99.13%

+23.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.11%

-46.88%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.73%

-68.67%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.10%

-99.13%

+67.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.19%

-84.28%

+45.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.83%

29.05%

-13.22%

Volatility

WTIU vs. EWV - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a higher volatility of 27.06% compared to ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) at 9.11%. This indicates that WTIU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTIUEWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.06%

9.11%

+17.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.98%

31.22%

+23.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.51%

39.88%

+27.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.62%

36.62%

+34.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.62%

34.95%

+35.67%

WTIU vs. EWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WTIU and EWV have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

WTIU vs. EWV - Dividend Comparison

WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EWV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan
4.98%3.63%3.39%3.42%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.33%0.00%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTIU and EWV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTIU has higher volatility (27.06%) compared to EWV (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIU dropped -75.73% vs EWV's -99.13%.

On 3-year performance, WTIU leads with 5.93% vs -28.45% for EWV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EWV has been the lower-risk option at 9.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 5.93% return vs -28.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTIU and EWV have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

EWV has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while EWV tracks MSCI Japan Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: REX and ProShares.

WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTIU and EWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer