WTIU vs. BSMW
WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTIU returned 2.14%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for BSMW. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.
Performance
WTIU vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 72.87% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.39% return.
WTIU
- 1D
- 12.13%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 60.71%
- YTD
- 72.87%
- 1Y
- 52.09%
- 3Y*
- 2.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 5.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 72.87% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -14.60% |
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.39% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTIU and BSMW is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2023 | -0.14 |
The correlation between WTIU and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTIU vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank
WTIU
BSMW
WTIU vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTIU | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.45 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.99 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 6.06 | -3.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTIU vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and BSMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTIU | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.73% | -7.57% | -68.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.11% | -2.92% | -45.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.73% | -7.34% | -68.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.73% | -0.89% | -37.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -1.70% | -37.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.43% | 0.96% | +19.47% |
Volatility
WTIU vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a higher volatility of 24.61% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.44%. This indicates that WTIU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTIU | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.61% | 0.44% | +24.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.03% | 1.93% | +55.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.53% | 2.64% | +66.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.96% | 4.93% | +66.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.96% | 4.93% | +66.03% |
WTIU vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTIU vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison
WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTIU and BSMW have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTIU has higher volatility (24.61%) compared to BSMW (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIU dropped -75.73% vs BSMW's -7.57%.
On 3-year performance, BSMW leads with 2.74% vs 2.14% for WTIU. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSMW has performed better with a 2.74% return vs 2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
WTIU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.18% for BSMW.
BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTIU and BSMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer