PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLS vs. CSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFLS vs. CSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFLS vs. CSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FFLS
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
-5.65%7.49%17.71%2.03%
CSM
Proshares Large Cap Core Plus
-5.83%21.84%22.09%10.69%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFLS having a -5.65% return and CSM slightly lower at -5.83%.


FFLS

1D
1.08%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
-5.65%
6M
-8.08%
1Y
-0.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSM

1D
2.46%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
-5.83%
6M
-1.69%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFLS vs. CSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLS has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CSM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFLS vs. CSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLS
FFLS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FFLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLS Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLS Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CSM
CSM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLS vs. CSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLSCSMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.00

0.99

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.06

1.53

-1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.23

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

1.49

-1.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.06

6.81

-6.87

FFLS vs. CSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the CSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLS and CSM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFLSCSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

0.99

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.81

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between FFLS and CSM is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FFLS vs. CSM - Dividend Comparison

FFLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than CSM's 1.16% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLS
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
6.97%6.58%3.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSM
Proshares Large Cap Core Plus
1.16%1.04%1.06%1.17%1.37%0.78%1.21%1.41%1.54%1.28%1.49%1.67%

Drawdowns

FFLS vs. CSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLS drawdown since its inception was -11.05%, smaller than the maximum CSM drawdown of -36.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLS and CSM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLSCSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.05%

-36.11%

+25.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-12.92%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.09%

-7.17%

-2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-4.07%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

2.82%

+1.36%

Volatility

FFLS vs. CSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) is 3.06%, while Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that FFLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFLSCSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

4.79%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.27%

9.49%

-3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.24%

18.97%

-9.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

17.12%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

18.37%

-7.18%