PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTID vs. YXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTID vs. YXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -62.23% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 8.21% return.


WTID

1D
-3.31%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
-62.23%
6M
-57.99%
1Y
-72.92%
3Y*
-48.40%
5Y*
10Y*

YXI

1D
1.95%
1M
2.80%
YTD
8.21%
6M
9.88%
1Y
0.05%
3Y*
-11.68%
5Y*
-2.65%
10Y*
-8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTID vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WTID
MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
-62.23%-44.50%-7.93%-17.12%
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
8.21%-22.87%-25.36%20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between WTID and YXI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023

0.16

The correlation between WTID and YXI shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTID vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTID
WTID Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
WTID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTID Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTID Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
WTID Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTID Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

YXI
YXI Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
YXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
YXI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
YXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
YXI Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTID vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTIDYXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.02

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

0.00

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.55

0.01

-1.55

WTID vs. YXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTID Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the YXI Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTID and YXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTIDYXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.10

0.00

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

-0.30

-0.31

Drawdowns

WTID vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, which is greater than YXI's maximum drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and YXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIDYXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.35%

-81.15%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.12%

-14.21%

-63.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.99%

-53.12%

-35.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.87%

-77.90%

-10.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.44%

-54.31%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.10%

8.18%

+38.92%

Volatility

WTID vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 25.63% compared to ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) at 7.21%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTIDYXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.63%

7.21%

+18.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.59%

14.86%

+38.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.54%

19.97%

+46.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.34%

31.40%

+38.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.34%

27.42%

+42.92%

WTID vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WTID and YXI have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

WTID vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison

WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
WTID
MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
2.84%3.60%4.35%2.66%0.27%0.00%0.08%1.01%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTID and YXI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTID has higher volatility (25.63%) compared to YXI (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.35% vs YXI's -81.15%.

On 3-year performance, YXI leads with -11.68% vs -48.40% for WTID. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, YXI has performed better with a -11.68% return vs -48.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTID and YXI have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.

WTID tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). They also come from different issuers: REX and ProShares.

YXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTID and YXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer