WTID vs. YQQQ
WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and YQQQ (YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTID is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while YQQQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. WTID is passively managed, while YQQQ is actively managed. Over the past year, WTID returned -74.21% vs -13.84% for YQQQ. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for YQQQ.
Performance
WTID vs. YQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -61.89% return, which is significantly lower than YQQQ's -8.57% return.
WTID
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- -61.89%
- 6M
- -57.67%
- 1Y
- -74.21%
- 3Y*
- -48.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YQQQ
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -6.24%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -6.48%
- 1Y
- -13.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTID vs. YQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -61.89% | -44.50% | 25.78% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.57% | -9.97% | -4.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTID and YQQQ is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2024 | 0.00 |
The correlation between WTID and YQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTID vs. YQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
WTID
YQQQ
WTID vs. YQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTID | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 0.83 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.67 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.57 | -1.61 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTID | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.12 | -1.11 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | -0.76 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
WTID vs. YQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, which is greater than YQQQ's maximum drawdown of -28.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and YQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTID | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.35% | -28.21% | -62.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.12% | -20.82% | -57.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.77% | -27.87% | -60.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.48% | -14.25% | -40.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.33% | 8.62% | +38.71% |
Volatility
WTID vs. YQQQ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) at 3.90%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTID | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 3.90% | +21.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.55% | 9.85% | +43.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.42% | 12.50% | +53.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.30% | 16.25% | +54.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.30% | 16.25% | +54.05% |
WTID vs. YQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTID vs. YQQQ - Dividend Comparison
WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | 32.16% | 31.71% | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTID and YQQQ have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTID has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to YQQQ (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.35% vs YQQQ's -28.21%.
On 1-year performance, YQQQ leads with -13.84% vs -74.21% for WTID. On fees, WTID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YQQQ has performed better with a -13.84% return vs -74.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YQQQ.
YQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 32.16%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.
WTID is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YQQQ is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: REX and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 0.99% for YQQQ.
YQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.11 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTID and YQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer