WTID vs. YQQQ
WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and YQQQ (YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTID is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while YQQQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. WTID is passively managed, while YQQQ is actively managed. Over the past year, WTID returned -74.04% vs -6.75% for YQQQ. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for YQQQ.
Performance
WTID vs. YQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -67.32% return, which is significantly lower than YQQQ's -3.37% return.
WTID
- 1D
- 4.70%
- 1M
- -32.80%
- 6M
- -56.78%
- YTD
- -67.32%
- 1Y
- -74.04%
- 3Y*
- -45.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -43.47%
YQQQ
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- 6M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- -3.37%
- 1Y
- -6.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $198.95K | $195.92K | $630.81K | |
| $671.99K | $468.60K | $586.43K |
WTID vs. YQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -67.32% | -44.50% | 21.54% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | -3.37% | -9.97% | -5.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTID and YQQQ is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2024 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between WTID and YQQQ has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.22, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTID vs. YQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
WTID
YQQQ
WTID vs. YQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTID | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.93 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.31 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | -0.67 | -0.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTID vs. YQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than YQQQ's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and YQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTID | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.80% | -29.10% | -61.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.06% | -21.80% | -54.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.37% | -23.77% | -66.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.96% | -15.17% | -40.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.62% | 10.10% | +39.52% |
Volatility
WTID vs. YQQQ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 23.44% compared to YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) at 4.45%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTID | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.44% | 4.45% | +18.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.62% | 11.97% | +44.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.15% | 14.30% | +54.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.60% | 16.54% | +54.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.60% | 16.54% | +54.06% |
WTID vs. YQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTID vs. YQQQ - Dividend Comparison
WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | 29.24% | 31.71% | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTID and YQQQ have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTID has higher volatility (23.44%) compared to YQQQ (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.80% vs YQQQ's -29.10%.
On 1-year performance, YQQQ leads with -6.75% vs -74.04% for WTID. On fees, WTID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YQQQ has performed better with a -6.75% return vs -74.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YQQQ.
YQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 29.24%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.
WTID is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YQQQ is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: REX and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 0.99% for YQQQ.
YQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTID and YQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer