WTID vs. PLTD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and PLTD (Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - WTID tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%) while PLTD tracks the Palantir Technologies Inc. (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WTID returned -74.04% vs 1.09% for PLTD. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for PLTD.

Performance

WTID vs. PLTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -67.32% return, which is significantly lower than PLTD's 24.17% return.

WTID

• 1D: 4.70%
• 1M: -32.80%
• 6M: -56.78%
• YTD: -67.32%
• 1Y: -74.04%
• 3Y*: -45.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -43.47%

PLTD

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 1.51%
• 6M: 3.97%
• YTD: 24.17%
• 1Y: 1.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -47.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares	$288.94M	$326.38M	$344.51M
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	$198.95K	$195.92K	$630.81K

WTID vs. PLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-67.32%	-44.50%	11.50%
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares	24.17%	-70.53%	-5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WTID and PLTD is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024	0.05

Return for Risk

WTID vs. PLTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WTID

WTID Risk / Return Rank: 1
WTID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
WTID Omega Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Martin Ratio Rank: 1

PLTD

PLTD Risk / Return Rank: 12
PLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
PLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
PLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
PLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WTID vs. PLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTID	PLTD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	0.02	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.20	0.42	-2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.05	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	0.04	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.49	0.08	-1.57

WTID vs. PLTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTID Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the PLTD Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTID and PLTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTID vs. PLTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than PLTD's maximum drawdown of -77.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and PLTD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTID	PLTD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.80%	-77.34%	-13.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.06%	-27.33%	-48.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-86.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.37%	-68.20%	-22.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.96%	-60.15%	+4.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.62%	14.74%	+34.88%

Volatility

WTID vs. PLTD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 23.44% compared to Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) at 13.59%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTID	PLTD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.44%	13.59%	+9.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.62%	40.13%	+16.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.15%	52.54%	+16.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.60%	62.61%	+7.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.60%	62.61%	+7.99%

WTID vs. PLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTD's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTID vs. PLTD - Dividend Comparison

WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

Position	TTM	2025
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares	2.82%	5.17%
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTID and PLTD in my portfolio?

WTID and PLTD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTID or PLTD?

WTID has higher volatility (23.44%) compared to PLTD (13.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.80% vs PLTD's -77.34%.

Which ETF is better, WTID or PLTD?

On 1-year performance, PLTD leads with 1.09% vs -74.04% for WTID. On fees, WTID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, PLTD has been the lower-risk option at 13.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTID or PLTD?

Over the 1-year period, PLTD has performed better with a 1.09% return vs -74.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTID or PLTD?

WTID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PLTD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTID or PLTD?

PLTD has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.

What is the main difference between WTID and PLTD?

WTID tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while PLTD tracks Palantir Technologies Inc. (-100%). They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 0.98% for PLTD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.