WTID vs. FTXN
WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and FTXN (First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTID is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while FTXN is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Oil & Gas Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTID returned -48.40%/yr vs 15.68%/yr for FTXN. At a correlation of -0.96, they often move in opposite directions. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXN.
Performance
WTID vs. FTXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -62.23% return, which is significantly lower than FTXN's 32.57% return.
WTID
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -62.23%
- 6M
- -57.99%
- 1Y
- -72.92%
- 3Y*
- -48.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXN
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- 32.57%
- 6M
- 28.04%
- 1Y
- 39.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
WTID vs. FTXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -62.23% | -44.50% | -7.93% | -17.12% |
FTXN First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF | 32.57% | -0.17% | 4.06% | 3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTID and FTXN is -0.96, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | -0.96 |
The correlation between WTID and FTXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.96 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
WTID vs. FTXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTID
FTXN
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
WTID
FTXN
Basic Materials
WTID
-
FTXN
-
Communication Services
WTID
-
FTXN
-
Consumer Cyclical
WTID
-
FTXN
-
Consumer Defensive
WTID
-
FTXN
-
Financial Services
WTID
-
FTXN
-
Healthcare
WTID
-
FTXN
-
Industrials
WTID
-
FTXN
-
Real Estate
WTID
-
FTXN
-
Technology
WTID
-
FTXN
-
Utilities
WTID
-
FTXN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTID vs. FTXN — Risk / Return Rank
WTID
FTXN
WTID vs. FTXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF (FTXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTID | FTXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.28 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 2.94 | -3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | 8.22 | -9.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTID | FTXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | 1.74 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 0.28 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
WTID vs. FTXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, which is greater than FTXN's maximum drawdown of -73.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and FTXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTID | FTXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.35% | -73.49% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.12% | -13.59% | -64.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.99% | -26.96% | -62.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.87% | -7.47% | -81.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.44% | -19.24% | -35.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.10% | 4.84% | +42.26% |
Volatility
WTID vs. FTXN - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 25.63% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF (FTXN) at 8.95%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTID | FTXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.63% | 8.95% | +16.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.59% | 17.87% | +35.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.54% | 22.98% | +43.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.34% | 29.67% | +40.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.34% | 31.80% | +38.54% |
WTID vs. FTXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTID vs. FTXN - Dividend Comparison
WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXN First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF | 2.04% | 2.83% | 2.51% | 3.41% | 2.26% | 1.04% | 1.76% | 2.72% | 2.16% | 1.78% | 0.20% |
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTID and FTXN have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTID has higher volatility (25.63%) compared to FTXN (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.35% vs FTXN's -73.49%.
On 3-year performance, FTXN leads with 15.68% vs -48.40% for WTID. On fees, FTXN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTXN has been the lower-risk option at 8.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTXN has performed better with a 15.68% return vs -48.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTID.
FTXN has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.
WTID is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FTXN is Energy Equities. WTID tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while FTXN tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Oil & Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 0.60% for FTXN.
FTXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTID and FTXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer